Newsline

Newsline , Politics

House Passes Stop Insider Trading Act

Posted on Thursday, July 23, 2026
|
by Lillian Ferrell
|
32 Comments
|
Print

The U.S. House of Representatives on Wednesday passed the Stop Insider Trading Act, legislation aimed at restricting members of Congress from buying individual stocks while in office amid ongoing bipartisan concerns over conflicts of interest and public trust.

Sponsored by Rep. Bryan Steil (R-WI), the measure passed the House by a vote of 232-198 and now heads to the Senate, where its future remains uncertain.

Supporters of the legislation argue that members of Congress should not be able to trade individual stocks while receiving confidential briefings on national security, economic policy, and other government matters that could affect financial markets. They say the bill would help strengthen public confidence in Congress by reducing the appearance of lawmakers personally benefiting from information unavailable to the public.

Steil said his bill will restore trust in Congress by limiting opportunities for lawmakers to unfairly benefit financially while serving in office.

“The core of this bill is to prevent members and their immediate families from being able to profit off of any inside information they may garner while serving here in Washington,” Steil said. “We do that by banning members from buying individual companies’ shares of stock.”

Many members of Congress have notably seen unusual net worth increases while in office despite receiving an annual salary of only $174,000. Perhaps the most famous such case is former Speaker Nancy Pelosi, whose stock portfolio skyrocketed from roughly $600,000 when she first entered office in 1987 to roughly $280 million today – a rate of return exponentially greater than that of the overall market and even many hedge funds. There is even a “Pelosi Stock Tracker” social media page so everyday investors can track Pelosi’s trades.

The Stop Insider Trading Act builds on the STOCK Act of 2012, which prohibits members of Congress and federal officials from using nonpublic information for personal financial gain and requires disclosure of many financial transactions. However, the STOCK Act does not prohibit lawmakers from owning or trading individual stocks, and its enforcement mechanisms are weak.

Under the Stop Insider Trading Act, members of Congress, their spouses, and dependent children would be prohibited from purchasing new shares of individual publicly traded companies while serving in office. Lawmakers would also be required to publicly disclose planned sales of existing individual stocks between 7 and 14 days before completing a transaction.

The bill does not require members to sell stocks they already own before taking office. Existing holdings may be retained, and lawmakers would be permitted to invest in diversified mutual funds, exchange-traded funds (ETFs), private companies, and blind trusts.

Lawmakers who violate the legislation would face fines of $2,000 or ten percent of the value of the transaction, whichever is greater, in addition to forfeiting any profits earned through noncompliant trades.

“The American people deserve to know their Member of Congress is not profiting off insider information. The Stop Insider Trading Act ensures that cannot happen,” Steil added.

The issue has drawn increasing attention in recent years following scrutiny of stock trades made by lawmakers from both parties. Public polling has consistently shown broad bipartisan support for placing additional restrictions on congressional stock trading, reaching as high as 86 percent in some polls. Supporters argue the reforms would improve transparency and reinforce public trust in government.

Despite bipartisan backing, the legislation also drew criticism. Many House Democrats opposed the measure, arguing it does not go far enough because it allows lawmakers to retain stocks they owned before entering office rather than requiring them to divest existing holdings.

The House approved the legislation as part of a broader legislative package.

The bill now moves to the upper chamber, where senators have yet to signal whether they will take up the House-passed measure. While there is bipartisan support for tightening congressional ethics rules, questions remain over whether senators will support the House approach or pursue broader restrictions before sending any final legislation to President Trump for his signature.

Lillian Ferrell is a senior at Hillsdale College studying English and music. She has experience in journalism and podcasting as the host of the Grace Over Grind podcast. Her written work focuses on American politics, culture, and public policy.

We hope you've enjoyed this article. While you're here, we have a small favor to ask...

The AMAC Action Logo

Your voice matters – and so does your support. By donating to AMAC Action, you help build a grassroots force committed to protecting liberty and promoting responsible governance. Support AMAC Action and help build the grassroots force defending liberty.

Donate Now
Share this article:
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
32 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Don Medley
Don Medley
2 days ago

Everyone who voted against this should be voted out of office immediately.

Dan W.
Dan W.
2 days ago

I can’t help but notice that this legislation applies only to the Legislative branch and not to the Executive branch or the Judicial branch.

I wonder why ?

Michael J
Michael J
3 days ago

Insider trading is illegal for anyone but politicians, how can this be? Of course these are the same who vote themselves payraises, pass legislation that allow banks to pay account holders pennies while allowing them to collect thousands-that’s in dollars. Bet Pelosi votes against it.

OldConservativeGuy
OldConservativeGuy
2 days ago

It’s about time. I had a long career in the financial services industry and was classified as “an access person” meaning I had access to information that could benefit me in the stock market. As a result FOR YEARS I had to pre-clear trades and report quarterly on transactions even if they were in Separately Managed Accounts managed by a portfolio manager I had never spoken to because I had the ABILITY to direct specific trades or holdings in those accounts if I wished. Solution: put investments in funds that were not self-directed such as mutual funds or in blind trusts. If I could do that AT GOVERNMENT DIRECTION through SEC and FINRA regulations, the GOVERNMENT POLITICIANS can do it too.

Nan
Nan
2 days ago

Passing the house won’t make it law. It has to pass in the Senate as well. The Senate has a habit of not passing legislation that might effect their own pocket negatively.

Pamela
Pamela
2 days ago

Yes, we need this very much! No more insider trading.

Dennis Werner
Dennis Werner
2 days ago

I guess when we allow elected officials to hold office for decades, we shouldn’t be surprised when some of them shape laws in ways that primarily benefit themselves.
The fact that members of Congress can vote themselves pay raises—even when they can’t accomplish one of their most basic responsibilities, passing a budget—is deeply frustrating.
Until we, as voters, begin replacing officials who have been in office for far too long and those who appear more focused on gaining power than serving the country’s best interests, we’ll continue to see corruption and the waste of taxpayer dollars.
As for this particular bill, even if it passes, I believe it still falls short of addressing many of the existing loopholes. For example, what’s to prevent an elected official from having an agent or a more distant family member purchase stocks on their behalf?

Carolyn Cassetty
Carolyn Cassetty
2 days ago

I don’t think limiting it to dependent children gets the job done. What about passing info to grown children? I think it should apply to all children and grandchildren. Applying it only to dependent children leaves a loophole big enough to fly a jumbo jet through.

Roseann Carpenter
Roseann Carpenter
2 days ago

A great bill, but now we have the senate. Wonder how Thune feels about this honest bill. Insider trading is against the law many have been jailed for it, ask Martha Stewart. What I can never understand, the House will pass a great bill, then it dies in the senate. Like the Save America Act. Why, if we need an ID to get a library card or pick up

a prescription, is it not advisable to have an ID to vote. But common sense is not a part of the ones who wish to cheat. Dim Senator Slotkin said it best, if the SAVE act gets passed, the democrats will never win another election.

Richmal Scarlet
Richmal Scarlet
31 minutes ago

Start now generating extra home based cash by doing very easy and simple job from home. Last month i have earned $19753 from this job in my part time. This job is just awesome and its earning are greater than 9 to 5 office job. 

Here is I started_______ L­I­V­E­J­O­B­1.C­O­M

Robert Mallory
Robert Mallory
2 days ago

Well, thats one way to get Pelosi to resign!

Candace
Candace
2 days ago

Wonder how long it will take them to change it…just like the last time

Dr. George R. Rivera, Jr.
Dr. George R. Rivera, Jr.
2 days ago

Wasn’t the SAVE Act coat tailing on this as well?

John C
John C
2 days ago

The penelity is too weak to affect behavior.I can’t believe the amount of Congress people that wouldn’t sigh on to this bill.They just wan’t the full money grab.Pitiful.

anna hubert
anna hubert
2 days ago

How far retroactive is it and will it even be implemented?

JDBTWO
JDBTWO
2 days ago

Really. Your average Joe who who gets involved with insider trading will go to jail. So why do we need a law to stop insider trading by our congressional delegation?

Sam
Sam
2 days ago

Sounds good, but I don NOT trust politicians to stick with it. Ask Nutsy Pelosi what SHE thinks….and unfortunately, she ain’t the ONLY one.

Nick Murphy
Nick Murphy
2 days ago
  • They passed that years ago, and then they repealed it in the middle of the night nobody knew about it That’s how all these people in both parties get extremely rich particularly Nancy pelosi. They need to make it a position that is only part-time and has no benefits and no retirement. So if you want to be there you really want to surgery and it’s not there to suck off the government budget
Invisible
Invisible
2 days ago

Do Pelosi and others like her, like Bernie Sanders, have to give back the millions they made on insider trading?

Isabel
Isabel
2 days ago

Glad it is FINALLY done!
The politicians have taken advantage for decades
Pray that it is enforced!!!!!

James D
James D
2 days ago

I recall the Contract with America from Newt Gingrich which said “Congress cannot exempt itself fro any laws it enacts”

David P
David P
2 days ago

It’ll NEVER pass in the Senate!

Max
Max
2 days ago

Hey, AMAC, what is wrong with your system? Th other day, I typed a comment, your system looked it over but did not post it. I typed a second comment, posted the comment and the first comment showed up as well as the new one. This morning, I typed a comment to Michael J, your system went on and on, then dropped my comment into cyber space. Your AI system is making decisions for itself of what will posted. Frustrating.

Isla Frank
Isla Frank
6 hours ago

I am making a good salary from home $4580-$5240/week , which is amazing und­er a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now its my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,  
.

Here is I started_______ J­o­b­a­t­h­o­m­e­1.C­o­m

Many desks and chairs in the classroom
October 1789: American General and statesman George Washington declining to accept terms, after the siege of Yorktown, from British General Charles Cornwallis, 1st Marquess Cornwallis (left), whose subsequent surrender practically ended the American War of Independence. (Photo by Three Lions/Getty Images)
Network data center. A shot of servers and hardwares in an internet data center
Caesar Rodney

Subscribe to AMAC Daily News and Games

32
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x